[Special issue PRO] A demonstration of estimands and sensitivity analyses for time-to-deterioration of patient reported outcomes.

In oncology trials, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), specifically patient-reported symptom burden and functional status, can support the interpretation of survival endpoints, such as progression-free survival. However, applying time-to-event endpoints to patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data is challenging. For example, in time-to-deterioration analyses clinical events such as disease progression are common in many settings and are often handled through censoring the patient at the time of occurrence; however, disease progression and HRQoL are often related leading to informative censoring. Special consideration to the definition of events and intercurrent events (ICEs) is necessary. In this work, we demonstrate time-to-deterioration of PRO estimands and sensitivity analyses to answer research questions using composite, hypothetical, and treatment policy strategies applied to a single endpoint of disease-related symptoms. Multiple imputation methods under both the missing-at-random and missing-not-at-random assumptions are used as sensitivity analyses of primary estimands. Hazard ratios ranged from 0.52 to 0.66 over all the estimands and sensitivity analyses modeling a robust treatment effect favoring the treatment in time to disease symptom deterioration or death. Differences in the estimands include how people who experience disease progression or discontinue the randomized treatment due to AEs are accounted for in the analysis. We use the estimand framework to define interpretable and principled approaches for different time-to-deterioration research questions and provide practical recommendations. Reporting the proportions of patient events and patient censoring by reason helps understand the mechanisms that drive the results, allowing for optimal interpretation.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin and Treated With First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Alone or With Pembrolizumab.

PURPOSE: Locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) affects patients' quality of life (QOL) and functioning. We describe the impact of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin (EV) alone or with pembrolizumab (P) on QOL/functioning/symptoms in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible from EV-103 Cohort K. METHODS: In this phase Ib/II trial, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to EV + P or EV monotherapy (mono). Exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) at baseline, once per week for cycles 1-3, and then in every cycle through the end of treatment. Changes in scores from baseline to week 24, reported as least squares mean (standard error), were assessed by mixed models for repeated measures. There were no formal statistical comparisons between treatment arms. RESULTS: Of 149 patients treated, 65 (EV + P) and 63 (EV mono) comprised the PRO analysis set. For EV + P, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL was maintained through week 24 with improvements in emotional functioning, pain, and insomnia. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain after EV + P at weeks 12 (-14.41 [3.14]) and 24 (-14.99 [3.56]) and BPI-SF worst pain at week 24 (-2.07 [0.37]). For EV mono, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL remained stable with clinically meaningful improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain (-12.55 [4.27]), insomnia (-14.46 [4.69]), and constipation (-10.09 [4.35]) at week 24. There were small-to-moderate improvements in BPI-SF worst pain at week 24. CONCLUSION: EV + P in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible was associated with preservation or improvement of QOL/functioning/symptoms. Improvement in pain was seen in both PRO instruments and treatment arms. These data complement clinical outcomes of 1L EV + P.

Establishing Meaningful Change Thresholds in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in ALTA-1L Trial.

OBJECTIVES: An earlier study from the ALTA-1L trial of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer demonstrated that brigatinib produces superior health-related quality of life (QoL) outcomes over crizotinib. This study aimed to derive meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) for European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13 to refine the earlier results. METHODS: Patients from the ALTA-1L trial were administered the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Responses were analyzed using anchor-based analysis, graphical analysis, distribution-based analysis, longitudinal responder analysis, and time to deterioration. RESULTS: The patient-reported outcome population comprised 262 patients who completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and at least 1 follow-up timepoint. Both anchors (QLQ-C30 items for overall health and QoL) had correlations >0.40 or < -0.40 with all functioning domains, fatigue, pain, appetite loss, and all dyspnea scores. Within-group analysis for most scales found the derived MCT was consistent with a cutoff of 10 points for classifying individual-patient change, except for 3-item dyspnea. The probability of improvement/remaining stable was significantly greater in the brigatinib group over crizotinib for the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning, appetite loss, and constipation domains. CONCLUSIONS: This study derived MCTs for EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 domains that may be applied in future studies and again demonstrated the superiority of brigatinib over crizotinib in health-related QoL outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Meaningful Change Thresholds for the Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Change from baseline score on the validated Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) is a widely used, patient-reported end point in clinical trials for psoriasis. Meaningful score change thresholds anchored to patient-reported assessments have not been established in a clinical trial setting. Objective: To evaluate meaningful within-patient score change thresholds for the PSSD using data from the phase 3 Program to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib, a Selective TYK2 Inhibitor (POETYK), PSO-1 clinical trial, which compared the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib vs placebo and apremilast among adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this predefined analysis using data from the POETYK PSO-1 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, conducted from August 7, 2018, to September 2, 2020, 666 adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis completed the PSSD daily throughout the trial. Meaningful change thresholds were derived by anchoring mean PSSD score change from baseline to week 16 to category improvements on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S). Interventions: Deucravacitinib, 6 mg, once daily; placebo; or apremilast, 30 mg, twice daily. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome was score change from baseline to week 16 on the PSSD, anchored to the PGI-C and PGI-S. Results: The trial included 666 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [13.4] years; 453 men [68.0%]). Three thresholds were identified using an analysis set of 609 patients. Score improvement of at least 15 points from baseline reflected meaningful within-patient change anchored to the PGI-C. Score improvements of 25 points were supported by both the PGI-C and the PGI-S, while a 30-point score change identified patients with greater improvements in their psoriasis symptoms and signs. Conclusions and Relevance: This analysis suggests that PSSD score improvements of 15, 25, or 30 points represent increasing improvements in disease burden that are meaningful to patients with psoriasis.

Integrating PROMIS Measures in a Treat-to-Target Approach to Standardize Patient-Centered Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a patient-centered rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treat-to-target (T2T) disease management approach on patient outcomes and patient satisfaction with care. METHODS: In this longitudinal, observational pilot study, rheumatologists implemented a modified T2T approach that integrated Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures for depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, and social function into RA care. Study participants selected 1 PROMIS domain to target treatment and completed quarterly follow-up assessments. Participants were classified as improved if their Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) changed by > 5 points. Change in PROMIS t scores was examined for the group with improved CDAI, and then compared to those with unchanged or worsened CDAI. Satisfaction with care was assessed using multiple measures, including the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Treatment Satisfaction-Patient Satisfaction Scale. RESULTS: The analytical sample (n = 119, median age 57 years, 90.8% female) was split between those with CDAI > 10 (n = 63) and CDAI ≤ 10 (n = 53). At 1 year, there was improvement in CDAI by > 5 points in 66% and 13% of individuals with baseline CDAI > 10 and baseline CDAI ≤ 10, respectively. Across all participants, improvement in CDAI by > 5 points correlated with improvements in the 5 PROMIS domains. Satisfaction with RA treatment also increased. CONCLUSION: The integration of PROMIS measures into the T2T approach for RA care was associated with improvements in disease activity, and improvement in disease activity was associated with improvements in PROMIS measures.

The association of baseline sarcoidosis measurements with 6-month outcomes that are of interest to patients: Results from the On-line Sarcoidosis Assessment Platform Study (OSAP).

INTRODUCTION: The impact of common measures to assess sarcoidosis have not been compared longitudinally to outcomes that are meaningful to patients. We prospectively examined the relationship of baseline measurements of sarcoidosis status to outcomes of interest to patients longitudinally over 6 months. METHODS: Sarcoidosis patients cared for at 6 US medical centers were "phenotyped" at baseline with measurements of pulmonary function, organ involvement, health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and their anti-sarcoidosis treatment history. These patients were followed for 6 months by monitoring outcomes of interest to patients (OIPs) including steps walked, calories expended, sleep, HRQoL measures, workdays missed and health care utilization. For each baseline phenotypic measurement, patients were dichotomized into two groups above and below a specified cutoff value. The area under the OIP versus time curve was compared between these two groups. RESULTS: The cutoff values for many baseline phenotypic measures distinguished the patients into groups with significantly different 6-month OIPs. The chosen cutoff for the patient global estimate of health status distinguished the most OIPs (13/15). The 6-min walk distance cutoff was associated with more OIPs than spirometric measures. All of the HRQOL measure cutoffs were associated with many OIPs, although most of them were other HRQOL measures. INTERPRETATION: Cutoffs for most of the phenotypic measures used to assess sarcoidosis distinguished groups of sarcoidosis patients with differing OIPs over the subsequent 6 months. The patients' global assessment of their disease was the most accurate of these measures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04342403.

Randomized trial of prophylactic antibiotics vs. placebo after midshaft-to-distal hypospadias repair: the PROPHY Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of prophylactic antibiotics after stented hypospadias repair is very common, but most research has not identified any clinical benefits of this practice. Only one study has found that postoperative prophylaxis reduces symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Data from the same trial suggested that prophylaxis may also reduce urethroplasty complications. No studies on this subject have been placebo-controlled. OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics on the incidence of infection or urethroplasty complications after stented repair of midshaft-to-distal hypospadias. STUDY DESIGN: Boys were eligible for this multicenter trial if they had a primary, single-stage repair of mid-to-distal hypospadias with placement of an open-drainage urethral stent for an intended duration of 5-10 days. Participants were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or placebo twice daily for 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was a composite of symptomatic UTI, surgical site infection (SSI), and urethroplasty complications, including urethrocutaneous fistula, meatal stenosis, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included each component of the primary outcome as well as acute adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and C. difficile colitis. RESULTS: Infection or urethroplasty complications occurred in 10 of 45 boys (22%) assigned to receive antibiotic prophylaxis as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) who received placebo (relative risk [RR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 5.8; p = 0.16). There were no significant differences between groups in symptomatic UTIs, SSIs, or any urethroplasty complications. Mild ADRs occurred in 3 of 45 boys (7%) assigned to antibiotics as compared with 5 of 48 (10%) given placebo (RR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 2.5; p = 0.72). There were no moderate-to-severe ADRs, and no patients developed C. difficile colitis. CONCLUSIONS: In this placebo-controlled trial of 93 patients, prophylactic antibiotics were not found to reduce infection or urethroplasty complications after stented mid-to-distal hypospadias repair. The study did not reach its desired sample size and was therefore underpowered to independently support a conclusion that prophylaxis is not beneficial. However, the result is consistent with most prior research on this subject. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02096159.

Meaningful Change Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue and Pain Interference Scores in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: We estimated meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue and Pain Interference in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The responsiveness of several patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was assessed among 521 patients with RA in the Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information Systems (ARAMIS) cohort. PROMIS Fatigue (7-item) and Pain Interference (6-item) short form instruments were administered at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Self-reported retrospective changes over the previous 6 months (a lot better/worse, a little better/worse, stayed the same) were obtained at 6 and 12 months' follow-up. We estimated MCTs using the mean change in PROMIS scores for patients who rated their change "a little better" or "a little worse." RESULTS: Baseline fatigue and pain interference scores were near normal (median 54 and 56, respectively). At 6 months, 7.9% of patients reported their fatigue was a little better compared to baseline (mean change [SD]: -2.6 [4.8]) and 22.8% a little worse (1.7 [5.6]). Pain was a little better for 11.5% of patients (-1.9 [6.1]) and a little worse for 24.2% of patients (0.6 [5.7]). At 12 months, results were similar. Thus, the MCT range was 1-2 points for both fatigue and pain interference. Correlations between change scores and retrospective ratings were low (0.13-0.29), indicating possible underestimation of MCT. CONCLUSION: The group-level MCT for PROMIS Fatigue and Pain Interference is roughly 2-3 points and corresponds to a small effect size, which is consistent with earlier work demonstrating an MCT of 2 points for PROMIS Physical Functioning.

Evaluating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire in a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Rationale: Improvement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with sarcoidosis is an important goal of management. The King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) are instruments that have been used in sarcoidosis.Objectives: We defined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as the within-patient clinically meaningful change threshold and determined the MCID of KSQ general health (KSQ GH), KSQ lung, and PGA using both anchor and distribution methods. The discriminatory properties of these MCIDs relative to other QoL instruments were then determined.Methods: Patients with sarcoidosis recruited from six centers in the United States were prospectively studied. Initially and at 6 months, patients completed a series of QoL questionnaires, including the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT), KSQ, and PGA, and spirometry. For the anchor method, receiver operator characteristic curves were used to determine the MCID for improvement or worsening. The distribution method using half of the standard deviation was calculated for KSQ GH, KSQ lung, and PGA.Results: Of the 325 patients enrolled in the study, 271 completed the 6-month evaluation. At 6 months, approximately half of patients were worse and 30% were improved based on previously established MCID values for the SGRQ, SF-36, and FAS. There were no discordant cases. There were significant correlations between the KSQ GH, KSQ lung, and PGA and most parameters assessed. The best correlations were with the SGRQ, SF-36, and FAS, which have established MCID values. Using anchor analysis, we found that most of the domains of SGRQ and SF-36 were able to determine the significant MCIDs for all three variables. These MCIDs were similar to those determined by the half least square method. We propose an MCID of 8 for the KSQ GH, an MCID of 4 for the KSQ lung, and an MCID of 2 for the PGA because these values captured >90% of parameters studied. These MCID values discriminated between changes in other QoL instruments.Conclusions: The determination of MCID values for KSQ lung, KSQ GH, and PGA may prove useful for clinical practice as well as clinical trials.

Ensuring the need is met: A 50-year simulation study of the National Kidney Registry's family voucher program.

The National Kidney Registry (NKR) Advanced Donation Program enables living donors the opportunity to donate altruistically, or in advance of a potential recipient's transplant, and to receive a voucher that can be redeemed for a future transplant facilitated by the NKR. Family vouchers allow a donor to identify multiple individuals within their immediate family, with the first person in that group in need of a transplant being prioritized to receive a kidney. An increase in vouchers introduces concerns that demand for future voucher redemptions could exceed the supply of available donors and kidneys. A Monte Carlo simulation model was constructed to estimate the annual number of voucher redemptions relative to the number of kidneys available over a 50-year time horizon under several projected scenarios for growth of the program. In all simulated scenarios, the number of available kidneys exceeded voucher redemptions every year. While not able to account for all real-life scenarios, this simulation study found that the NKR should be able to satisfy the likely redemption of increasing numbers of vouchers under a range of possible scenarios over a 50-year time horizon. This modeling exercise suggests that a donor family's future needs can be satisfied through the voucher program.

Your Path to Transplant: A randomized controlled trial of a tailored expert system intervention to increase knowledge, attitudes, and pursuit of kidney transplant.

Individually tailoring education over time may help more patients, especially racial/ethnic minorities, get waitlisted and pursue deceased and living donor kidney transplant (DDKT and LDKT, respectively). We enrolled 802 patients pursuing transplant evaluation at the University of California, Los Angeles Transplant Program into a randomized education trial. We compared the effectiveness of Your Path to Transplant (YPT), an individually tailored coaching and education program delivered at 4 time points, with standard of care (SOC) education on improving readiness to pursue DDKT and LDKT, transplant knowledge, taking 15 small transplant-related actions, and pursuing transplant (waitlisting or LDKT rates) over 8 months. Survey outcomes were collected prior to evaluation and at 4 and 8 months. Time to waitlisting or LDKT was assessed with at least 18 months of follow-up. At 8 months, compared to SOC, the YPT group demonstrated increased LDKT readiness (47% vs 33%, P = .003) and transplant knowledge (effect size [ES] = 0.41, P < .001). Transplant pursuit was higher in the YPT group (hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.79, P = .002). A focused, coordinated education effort can improve transplant-seeking behaviors and waitlisting rates. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02181114.

Personalized prediction of delayed graft function for recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants with machine learning.

Machine learning (ML) has shown its potential to improve patient care over the last decade. In organ transplantation, delayed graft function (DGF) remains a major concern in deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). To this end, we harnessed ML to build personalized prognostic models to predict DGF. Registry data were obtained on adult DDKT recipients for model development (n = 55,044) and validation (n = 6176). Incidence rates of DGF were 25.1% and 26.3% for the development and validation sets, respectively. Twenty-six predictors were identified via recursive feature elimination with random forest. Five widely-used ML algorithms-logistic regression (LR), elastic net, random forest, artificial neural network (ANN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) were trained and compared with a baseline LR model fitted with previously identified risk factors. The new ML models, particularly ANN with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.732 and XGB with ROC-AUC of 0.735, exhibited superior performance to the baseline model (ROC-AUC = 0.705). This study demonstrates the use of ML as a viable strategy to enable personalized risk quantification for medical applications. If successfully implemented, our models may aid in both risk quantification for DGF prevention clinical trials and personalized clinical decision making.

Development and Preliminary Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS-PRO).

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures developed and validated on patients with the currently defined phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are needed to support clinical trials in CRS. OBJECTIVE: This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of the CRS-PRO, a new PRO measure of CRS. METHODS: Instrument development was performed through structured interviews and focus groups with clinical experts and 45 patients with CRS meeting current definitions of disease, 21 patients with CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and 24 patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) to identify items important to patients. Then another 50 patients (32 with CRSsNP and 18 with CRSwNP) with stable CRS symptoms were enrolled to evaluate the reliability of the instrument. Each patient completed the CRS-PRO, Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), and 4 Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System short forms at the baseline visit and then at least 7 days later. RESULTS: After the development process, 21 items were identified from the conceptual domains of physical symptoms, sensory impairment, psychosocial effects, and life impact. Using the responses of the 50 patients with CRS, 21 draft items were further refined to 12 items by eliminating conceptually similar or highly correlated items or those with low mean symptom severity. The 12-item questionnaire was shown to have excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α, 0.86) and test-retest reliability with a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89) and Pearson's correlation (r = 0.82, P < .0001). The 12-item CRS-PRO correlated highly with the longer SNOT-22 (r = 0.83, P < .0001) demonstrating its concurrent validity. We also demonstrated validity and reliability in a separate analysis for patients with CRSsNP and CRSwNP. CONCLUSION: The CRS-PRO is a concise, valid, and reliable measure that was developed with extensive input from patients with CRS with current disease definitions.

Symptom burden trajectories experienced by patients with brain tumors.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of childhood brain tumors experience persistent health concerns across their lifespan. In the current study, the authors evaluated changes in symptom burden over the course of 12 months using pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. METHODS: Data from 202 survivors aged 8 to 21 years and 262 parents of survivors who were aged 5 to 21 years were analyzed. All completed a PROMIS Cognition short form and computerized adaptive tests of pediatric Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Fatigue, Mobility, Upper Extremity Function, and Peer Relationships. Approximately one-half of participants (223 participants: 97 survivors of childhood brain tumors and 126 parents) completed the 12-month follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated group-level symptoms over time. Cox proportional hazard models explored whether symptoms predicted survival, and latent class growth analysis investigated patterns of individual-level symptom changes over time. RESULTS: Linear mixed-effects models demonstrated that patient-reported Cognition and parent-reported Anxiety worsened over time. Latent class growth analysis results indicated that patient and parent reports diverged, both with regard to the number of classes identified and in the trends of these classes. Parents and patients reported similar patterns of depression over time. For the other areas, parents either were more likely to observe different patterns (Peer Relationships and Mobility) or less likely to observe different patterns (Upper Extremity Function, Cognition, Anxiety, and Fatigue). Baseline patient-reported Mobility and Upper Extremity Function were found to be associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of childhood brain tumors demonstrated different trajectory patterns of symptom burden. Along with baseline functioning status and days since treatment, patient-reported Mobility and Upper Extremity Function were associated with survival, suggesting a possible role for patient-reported outcomes in clinical care, especially individualized, tailored assessments such as PROMIS.

Responsiveness and Convergent Validity of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS-PRO).

BACKGROUND: The CRS-PRO is a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that was developed using extensive patient input per Food and Drug Administration guidance on PROMs acceptable for use as end points in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness and convergent validity of the CRS-PRO following standard-of-care medical therapy. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 51 patients (21 with nasal polyps and 30 without) with newly diagnosed CRS or having an acute CRS exacerbation who were initiated on appropriate medical therapy. At the baseline visit each patient completed the CRS-PRO questionnaire, the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test, the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire, and 4 Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System short forms along with objective testing including endoscopic and radiographic scores, smell discrimination, and nasal inspiratory flow testing. This same battery of questionnaires and testing was administered at a follow-up visit 4 to 8 weeks later. RESULTS: We verified that shortening the 21-item CRS-PRO to 12 items as previously described maintains its psychometric properties. The 12-item CRS-PRO was responsive with a large effect size (Cohen's d, 0.94) comparable to the longer 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (Cohen's d, 0.93). The instrument was slightly more responsive to medically treated patients with CRS without nasal polyps compared with patients with CRS with nasal polyps (Cohen's d, 1.1 vs 0.89, respectively). The change in 12-item CRS-PRO total score has moderate correlation with change in Lund-Mackay computed tomography scores. CONCLUSIONS: The CRS-PRO is a 12-item rigorously developed, responsive, and valid PROM that was developed using extensive input from patients with current definitions of CRS, including its 2 major phenotypes.

Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of recall periods on the assessment of physical function, we compared, in cancer and general population samples, the standard administration of PROMIS Physical Function items without a recall period to administrations with 24-hour and 7-day recall periods. METHODS: We administered 31 items from the PROMIS Physical Function v2.0 item bank to 2400 respondents (n = 1001 with cancer; n = 1399 from the general population). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three recall conditions (no recall, 24-hours, or 7-days) and one of two "reminder" conditions (with recall periods presented only at the start of the survey or with every item). We assessed items for potential differential item functioning (DIF) by recall time period. We then tested recall and reminder effects with analysis of variance controlling for demographics, English fluency, and co-morbidities. RESULTS: Based on conservative pre-set criteria, no items were flagged for recall time period-related DIF. Using analysis of variance, each condition was compared to the standard PROMIS administration for Physical Function (no recall period). There was no evidence of significant differences among groups in the cancer sample. In the general population sample, only the 24-hour recall condition with reminders was significantly different from the "no recall" PROMIS standard. At the item level, for both samples, the number of items with non-trivial effect size differences across conditions was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to no recall, the use of a recall period has little to no effect upon PROMIS physical function responses or scores. We recommend that PROMIS Physical Function be administered with the standard PROMIS "no recall" period.

Trajectories of health-related quality of life among renal transplant patients associated with graft failure and symptom distress: Analysis of the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials.

Understanding the correlation between transplant symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and graft outcomes is needed to support patient-focused drug development and posttransplant management. A post-hoc analysis of patient-reported outcomes from the Phase III belatacept trials was conducted in order to investigate the interrelationship between trajectories of HRQoL, symptom experience, and allograft outcomes. HRQoL and symptom experience were evaluated using Short-Form 36 Survey (SF-36) and Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Distress Scale (MTSOSD-59R), respectively. HRQoL was captured in 831 eligible renal transplant patients at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months posttransplant. Following transplantation, patients reported improvements in all SF-36 subscales compared to baseline. Latent class analysis revealed four trajectories in perceived general health, which were associated with graft failure after adjustment. Compared to patients with good perceived health, patients with fair and poor perceived health had 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-14.8, P < .01) and 19.8 (95% CI 5.9-66.0, P < .01) times the risk of graft failure, respectively. Using multinomial logistic regression, different sets of symptoms were associated with perceived general health at baseline and 12 months posttransplant. The study supports monitoring HRQoL and symptom experience to capture each patient's health perspective, improve drug development, and optimize posttransplant management.

Development and Validation of a Socioeconomic Kidney Transplant Derailers Index.

Socioeconomic barriers can prevent successful kidney transplant (KT) but are difficult to measure efficiently in clinical settings. We created and validated an individual-level, single score Kidney Transplant Derailers Index (KTDI) and assessed its association with waitlisting and living donor KT (LDKT) rates. METHODS: The dataset included 733 patients presenting for KT evaluation in a transplant center in California. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify socioeconomic barriers to KT (derailers) to include in the index. Potential KT derailers included health insurance, employment, financial insecurity, educational attainment, perception of neighborhood safety, access to a vehicle, having a washer/dryer, and quality of social support. Validity was tested with associations between KTDI scores and the following: (1) the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and (2) time to KT waitlisting and LDKT. RESULTS: Nine derailers were retained, omitting only social support level from the original set. The KTDI was scored by summing the number of derailers endorsed (mean: 3.0; range: 0-9). Black patients had higher estimated KTDI scores than other patient groups (versus White patients, 3.8 versus 2.1; P < 0.001, effect size = 0.81). In addition, the KTDI was associated with the ADI (γ = 0.70, SE = 0.07; P < 0.001). Finally, in comparison to the lower tertile, patients in the upper and middle KTDI tertiles had lower hazard of waitlisting (upper tertile hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.45; middle tertile HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.72) and receiving an LDKT (upper tertile HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08-0.30; middle tertile HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62). These associations remained significant when adjusting for the ADI and other patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The KTDI is a valid indicator of socioeconomic barriers to KT for individual patients that can be used to identify patients at risk for not receiving a KT.